<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Score one for the good guys: Court rejects Wal-Mart&#8217;s trademark claim</title>
	<atom:link href="http://citizenvox.wordpress.com/2008/03/21/score-one-for-the-good-guys-court-rejects-wal-marts-trademark-claim/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://citizenvox.wordpress.com/2008/03/21/score-one-for-the-good-guys-court-rejects-wal-marts-trademark-claim/</link>
	<description>Speaking out for the public interest</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 04:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michigan company loses Internet trademark case, told to grin and bear it &#171; citizenvox.org</title>
		<link>http://citizenvox.wordpress.com/2008/03/21/score-one-for-the-good-guys-court-rejects-wal-marts-trademark-claim/#comment-326</link>
		<dc:creator>Michigan company loses Internet trademark case, told to grin and bear it &#171; citizenvox.org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 19:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citizenvox.wordpress.com/?p=155#comment-326</guid>
		<description>[...] that they the First Amendment isn&#8217;t so easily quelled. The win in the Lifestyle case follows our win against Wal-Mart back in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] that they the First Amendment isn&#8217;t so easily quelled. The win in the Lifestyle case follows our win against Wal-Mart back in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Newman</title>
		<link>http://citizenvox.wordpress.com/2008/03/21/score-one-for-the-good-guys-court-rejects-wal-marts-trademark-claim/#comment-268</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Newman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 19:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citizenvox.wordpress.com/?p=155#comment-268</guid>
		<description>You're right, Amber. While the story got a lot of attention in the blogosphere, it wasn't widely picked up by the mainstream media. The Atlanta Journal Constitution had an excellent piece: 
 http://www.ajc.com/business/content/metro/atlanta/stories/2008/03/25/walmart_0326.html

That story, in turn, got picked up by the Associated Press and was printed in a shorter version in a few dozen newspapers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right, Amber. While the story got a lot of attention in the blogosphere, it wasn&#8217;t widely picked up by the mainstream media. The Atlanta Journal Constitution had an excellent piece:<br />
 <a href="http://www.ajc.com/business/content/metro/atlanta/stories/2008/03/25/walmart_0326.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.ajc.com/business/content/metro/atlanta/stories/2008/03/25/walmart_0326.html</a></p>
<p>That story, in turn, got picked up by the Associated Press and was printed in a shorter version in a few dozen newspapers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amber</title>
		<link>http://citizenvox.wordpress.com/2008/03/21/score-one-for-the-good-guys-court-rejects-wal-marts-trademark-claim/#comment-266</link>
		<dc:creator>Amber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 18:40:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citizenvox.wordpress.com/?p=155#comment-266</guid>
		<description>I heard about the smiley face issue and Wal-Mar not winning (so glad) however, I didn't get time to read the whole story.  When I finally had time to look it up I noticed something interesting... ... that I couldn't find any real news articles on it.  Only bits and pieces from sources such as this. That lead me to wondering why there was so little "news sources" available about it?  Have they been removed (as I did find a number of 'dead' links) or was it just not promoted enough?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard about the smiley face issue and Wal-Mar not winning (so glad) however, I didn&#8217;t get time to read the whole story.  When I finally had time to look it up I noticed something interesting&#8230; &#8230; that I couldn&#8217;t find any real news articles on it.  Only bits and pieces from sources such as this. That lead me to wondering why there was so little &#8220;news sources&#8221; available about it?  Have they been removed (as I did find a number of &#8216;dead&#8217; links) or was it just not promoted enough?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Humility</title>
		<link>http://citizenvox.wordpress.com/2008/03/21/score-one-for-the-good-guys-court-rejects-wal-marts-trademark-claim/#comment-254</link>
		<dc:creator>Humility</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 02:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citizenvox.wordpress.com/?p=155#comment-254</guid>
		<description>I don't buy stuff from foreign countries unless I cannot find one that says made in U.S.A. Surprisingly you can still find many Items that say that. 

Electronics,Kitchenware,office supplies and some other stuff probably. But I only ever need to buy the above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t buy stuff from foreign countries unless I cannot find one that says made in U.S.A. Surprisingly you can still find many Items that say that. </p>
<p>Electronics,Kitchenware,office supplies and some other stuff probably. But I only ever need to buy the above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Court rejects Wal-Mart’s smiley-face trademark claim! &#124; sanver.info</title>
		<link>http://citizenvox.wordpress.com/2008/03/21/score-one-for-the-good-guys-court-rejects-wal-marts-trademark-claim/#comment-251</link>
		<dc:creator>Court rejects Wal-Mart’s smiley-face trademark claim! &#124; sanver.info</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 06:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citizenvox.wordpress.com/?p=155#comment-251</guid>
		<description>[...] read more &#124; digg story [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] read more | digg story [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Random News Table &#124; Uncle Bear</title>
		<link>http://citizenvox.wordpress.com/2008/03/21/score-one-for-the-good-guys-court-rejects-wal-marts-trademark-claim/#comment-250</link>
		<dc:creator>Random News Table &#124; Uncle Bear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 06:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citizenvox.wordpress.com/?p=155#comment-250</guid>
		<description>[...] Court rejects Wal-Mart’s trademark claim This ruling shows that even the biggest company in America is subject to parody, and that trademark rights must yield to the right of free speech. (tags: corpolitical) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Court rejects Wal-Mart’s trademark claim This ruling shows that even the biggest company in America is subject to parody, and that trademark rights must yield to the right of free speech. (tags: corpolitical) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kat</title>
		<link>http://citizenvox.wordpress.com/2008/03/21/score-one-for-the-good-guys-court-rejects-wal-marts-trademark-claim/#comment-249</link>
		<dc:creator>Kat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 05:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citizenvox.wordpress.com/?p=155#comment-249</guid>
		<description>Since walmart is suing an ex-employee for money she recovered from the accident that her left her severely brain-damaged and that has been set aside for her care, I am vowing not to shop in any walmart ever again.  Join me?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since walmart is suing an ex-employee for money she recovered from the accident that her left her severely brain-damaged and that has been set aside for her care, I am vowing not to shop in any walmart ever again.  Join me?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smiley has been liberated &#124; Seven whole days</title>
		<link>http://citizenvox.wordpress.com/2008/03/21/score-one-for-the-good-guys-court-rejects-wal-marts-trademark-claim/#comment-245</link>
		<dc:creator>Smiley has been liberated &#124; Seven whole days</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Mar 2008 01:59:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citizenvox.wordpress.com/?p=155#comment-245</guid>
		<description>[...] it turns out that Wal-Mart got a little testy over some parody sites, notably www.walocaust.com and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it turns out that Wal-Mart got a little testy over some parody sites, notably <a href="http://www.walocaust.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.walocaust.com</a> and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clsygrm</title>
		<link>http://citizenvox.wordpress.com/2008/03/21/score-one-for-the-good-guys-court-rejects-wal-marts-trademark-claim/#comment-244</link>
		<dc:creator>clsygrm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 23:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citizenvox.wordpress.com/?p=155#comment-244</guid>
		<description>Most products in the "big" stores - Macy's, Younkers, Dillards, etc, come from China, India, Turkey, etc, all of which employ sweatshops to manufacture products.  It is very hard to find anything made in the US these days.  Even our fabric mills which produced premium material have been replaced by inferior fabrics from overseas companies.  The real problem must be Wal-Mart objecting over the Logo being used by the GA man.  I wouldn't be happy about that, either.

As to the employee conditions at Wal-Mart stores, the person to be held to task is the Store Manager, not the employees in general.  If the Store Manager doesn't see that all of the employee's do their job correctly, then there will always be the 'workers' and the lazy ones who are just there to collect a paycheck w/o working for it.  As for the rest, those who work at Wal-Mart stores all decide if their pay is correct, their insurance is adequate, and, if they want the JOB.  Yes, Wal-Mart does keep track of hours worked.  Also, any employee who develops a program while at work will not benefit from it's being incorporated into the mainstream work.  That is the norm for all companies.  Most companies require a signature to that effect upon hiring because employee's can and do come up with better and more efficient ways to do the routine work which helps the bottom line.  I created programs while working for companies and my reward was a "thank you" from my bosses clients, not from my boss himself.  A gift certificate is really nice.

Bottom line is this:  you don't have to shop at Wal-Mart, you can pay more for the same product at Target, K-Mart or other stores who have the same products and pay their employee's the same way!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most products in the &#8220;big&#8221; stores - Macy&#8217;s, Younkers, Dillards, etc, come from China, India, Turkey, etc, all of which employ sweatshops to manufacture products.  It is very hard to find anything made in the US these days.  Even our fabric mills which produced premium material have been replaced by inferior fabrics from overseas companies.  The real problem must be Wal-Mart objecting over the Logo being used by the GA man.  I wouldn&#8217;t be happy about that, either.</p>
<p>As to the employee conditions at Wal-Mart stores, the person to be held to task is the Store Manager, not the employees in general.  If the Store Manager doesn&#8217;t see that all of the employee&#8217;s do their job correctly, then there will always be the &#8216;workers&#8217; and the lazy ones who are just there to collect a paycheck w/o working for it.  As for the rest, those who work at Wal-Mart stores all decide if their pay is correct, their insurance is adequate, and, if they want the JOB.  Yes, Wal-Mart does keep track of hours worked.  Also, any employee who develops a program while at work will not benefit from it&#8217;s being incorporated into the mainstream work.  That is the norm for all companies.  Most companies require a signature to that effect upon hiring because employee&#8217;s can and do come up with better and more efficient ways to do the routine work which helps the bottom line.  I created programs while working for companies and my reward was a &#8220;thank you&#8221; from my bosses clients, not from my boss himself.  A gift certificate is really nice.</p>
<p>Bottom line is this:  you don&#8217;t have to shop at Wal-Mart, you can pay more for the same product at Target, K-Mart or other stores who have the same products and pay their employee&#8217;s the same way!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick van Slee</title>
		<link>http://citizenvox.wordpress.com/2008/03/21/score-one-for-the-good-guys-court-rejects-wal-marts-trademark-claim/#comment-243</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick van Slee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Mar 2008 22:47:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://citizenvox.wordpress.com/?p=155#comment-243</guid>
		<description>Right on, Joe Newman</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right on, Joe Newman</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
