• Home
  • About
  • Links

Feeds:
Posts
Comments

About

The contributors to this blog work for Public Citizen, a national, nonprofit organization that has been standing up to corporate power and holding government accountable since 1971.

Public Citizen fights for openness and democratic accountability in government; for the right of consumers to seek redress in the courts; for clean, safe and sustainable energy sources; for social and economic justice in trade policies; for strong health, safety and environmental protections; and for safe, effective and affordable prescription drugs and health care.

To learn more about each of Public Citizen’s divisions and its Texas office, click on the links below.

  • Congress Watch
  • Energy Program
  • Global Trade Watch
  • Health Research Group
  • Litigation Group
  • Texas State Office

Policies

About the Contributors:
Although the contributors to this blog are staff members of Public Citizen, the views expressed here are those of the individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect those of Public Citizen.

Intellectual Property:
It is our policy to respond to notices of infringement of copyright and other intellectual property rights. We will promptly process and investigate notices of alleged infringement and take appropriate action under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. 512 (“DMCA”), and other applicable intellectual property laws, including the termination of access by repeat infringers. Pursuant to the DMCA, notifications of claimed copyright infringement should be sent to our designated agent: Marybeth Stiles, Office Manager, Public Citizen Litigation Group, 1600 20th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20009. To be effective, the notification must be a clear written communication that includes the following: (a) a signature of a person authorized to act on behalf of the owner of the exclusive right that is allegedly infringed; (b) identification of the copyrighted work claimed to have been infringed; (c) identification of the material that is claimed to be infringing or to be the subject of infringing activity and that is to be removed or access to which is to be disabled, and information reasonably sufficient to permit us to locate the material; (d) information reasonably sufficient to permit us to contact the complaining party, such as an address, telephone number, and, if available, an electronic mail address at which the complaining party may be contacted; (e) a statement that the complaining party has a good-faith belief that use of the material in the manner complained of is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or applicable law; and (f) a statement that the information in the notification is accurate, and under penalty of perjury, that the complaining party is authorized to act on behalf of the owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed.

Share this:

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit

Like this:

Like Loading...

  • Follow Our Tweets!

    • MT @Lisa_PubCitizen: Read this op-ed in @washingtonpost on our Bright Lines Project #IRS #clearguidelines washingtonpost.com/opinions/nonpr… 1 day ago
    • Thank you to IL State Rep @ElaineNekritz and the IL House Judiciary Committee for passing anti-Citizens United resolution by an 11-4 vote! 1 day ago
    • SJR27, calling for an amendment to overturn #CitizensUnited, passed the Illinois House Judiciary Cmte by a 11-4 vote! Full legislature next! 1 day ago
  • Support Our Work

  • Socialize With Us

  • Categories

  • Visit Our Other Sites

    • Public Citizen Read our reports and publications
    • Eyes on Trade Challenging globalization
    • Citizen Energy Fighting for a sustainable future
    • Law & Policy Justice for consumers
    • Texas Vox Activism from the Lone Star state
    • Worst Pills An independent pharma watchdog
  • Recent Comments

    Wellescent Health Bo… on The Midmorning Refill: Nancy P…
    Democracy Now! discu… on When it comes to cheating the…
    Marcia Everett on The Midmorning Refill: Mother…
    David Peterson on When it comes to cheating the…
    otto mandarin on Weissman: It’s not a pre…
  • Flickr Photos

    Pittsburgh EQT shareholder rally against corporate money in politics

    Pittsburgh EQT shareholder rally against corporate money in politics

    University of Pittsburgh graduate Eva Resnick-Day speaking at Pittsburgh EQT shareholder rally against corporate money in politics (with PennEnvironment's Erika Staaf).

    More Photos
  • Tags

    access to justice Activism arbitration bailout banking big oil BP campaign contributions Campaign Finance campaign finance reform Citizens United Congress Consumer Protection corporate power DISCLOSE Act Don't Get Rolled economy elections Energy energy & climate fair trade FDA financial reform global warming government reform gulf of mexico health & safety health care Jon Stewart Lobbying lobbyists money in politics obama offshore drilling oil oil spill political ads politics single-payer stephen colbert Supreme Court Transparency U.S. Chamber of Commerce wall street wto
  • Archives

  • Meta

    • Register
    • Log in
    • Entries RSS
    • Comments RSS
    • WordPress.com
  • NetworkedBlogs
    Blog:
    Public Citizen - Citizen Vox
    Topics:
    progressive, reform, politics
     
    Follow my blog

Blog at WordPress.com.

Theme: MistyLook by WPThemes.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Powered by WordPress.com
loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.
%d bloggers like this: