• Home
  • About
  • Links

Feeds:
Posts
Comments
« Closing BP’s escape routes
WaPo’s Milloy: How could anyone pump gas at BP? »

DISCLOSE Act is greater than the NRA exemption

June 16, 2010 by Craig Holman

Holman

Carving out an exemption for the NRA to the individual donor disclosure requirement of the DISCLOSE Act (H.R. 5175) is a strategic decision by congressional leaders to get the measure approved by the House. It is a troubling decision, but the carve-out poses little damage to the overall objectives of the bill.

The legislation still provides what the public desperately needs in the wake of the Supreme Court’s disastrous Citizens United decision: full disclosure of corporate and wealthy funding sources behind express advocacy ads and electioneering communications; extends the electioneering communications window to cover most of an election period; and applies some restrictions on major government contractors and foreign entities in financing campaign ads.

The NRA (and AARP and Humane Society) will still have to disclose in their ads that they are financed by the NRA and report to the FEC how much the NRA spends on electioneering activity. The head of the NRA will have to do a stand-by-your-ad disclaimer in each ad. Corporate money cannot be used by the NRA to finance these ads, and the sources of funds given to the NRA and earmarked for campaign ads will continue to be subject to disclosure under campaign finance laws. Personally I ardently disagree with the NRA’s politics, and I find the exemption reprehensible as a give-in to a powerful special interest, but the NRA is not a front group for corporate interests and so its exemption from disclosing its individual donors does not fundamentally undermine the DISCLOSE Act.

When the Supreme Court decided unilaterally to re-write the nation’s campaign finance laws and allow unlimited corporate spending in elections, it has become imperative for Congress to give voters a chance to know who is paying how much to influence our elections. The DISCLOSE Act closes major loopholes in the current disclosure laws – loopholes that will become all the more problematic as corporations seek ways to influence elections and pressure lawmakers by funneling money into innocuous-sounding outside groups to handle their advertising campaigns secretly on their behalf. This measure is far too important to sacrifice.

It is not at all evident to me that passage of this bill required a special provision exempting the NRA from disclosing its individual donors. We had a great bill written and ready on May 27th. But when other non-profit groups joined the NRA in demanding loopholes in the disclosure requirements, congressional leaders withdrew the bill and renegotiated it. Rep. Van Hollen held firm against poking gaping loopholes in the measure, and finally agreed to the limited exemption principally benefiting the NRA. The political strategy seems to be a wash, because now other non-profits are opposing the legislation unless they too get carve-outs.

We cannot let special interest politics prevail. Any further amendments or negotiations to weaken the disclosure requirements must be rejected, and the DISCLOSE Act made law by the July 4th recess. Though no one is sure because there are no effective disclosure requirements, it appears that corporate political spending has already increased threefold in the first quarter of 2010 – and we have not even entered the high-spending general election yet. Unless the DISCLOSE Act is approved promptly, and perhaps improved after becoming law, we will enter the free-spending 2010 elections totally blind.

Craig Holman is the government affairs lobbyist for Public Citizen.

Share this:

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Reddit

Like this:

Like Loading...

Related

Posted in Campaign Finance, Congress | Tagged campaign finance reform, DISCLOSE Act, fec, NRA, Transparency | 2 Comments

2 Responses

  1. on June 22, 2010 at 10:36 pm Samuel Kravetz

    I certainly am for having the big contributors named for who they are backing and what laws also.


  2. on November 3, 2010 at 2:01 pm Allen

    After seeing the Obscene amount of money the NRA Pissed away during this election. It is clear they are not solely focused on our Secondment Amen Rights. I will not renew my membership. They are not getting ONE MORE DIME from me! Check it out. Follow their money. You will be Shocked and dissappointed.



Comments are closed.

  • Follow Our Tweets!

    • Extreme heat is making work more dangerous. When asked to make conditions safer, companies said, “If we give them… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 1 hour ago
    • RT @PublicCitizenTX: There needs to be controlled regulation on crypto miners. Otherwise, Texas, a state with a recent history of blackouts… 6 hours ago
    • Here's your list of every Republican senator who voted AGAINST making insulin affordable: (4/4) Marco Rubio, FL Be… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 1 day ago
  • Support Our Work

  • Socialize With Us

  • Categories

  • Visit Our Other Sites

    • Public Citizen Read our reports and publications
    • Eyes on Trade Challenging globalization
    • Citizen Energy Fighting for a sustainable future
    • Law & Policy Justice for consumers
    • Texas Vox Activism from the Lone Star state
    • Worst Pills An independent pharma watchdog
  • Recent Comments

    Wellescent Health Bo… on The Midmorning Refill: Nancy P…
    Democracy Now! discu… on When it comes to cheating the…
    Marcia Everett on The Midmorning Refill: Mother…
    David Peterson on When it comes to cheating the…
    otto mandarin on Weissman: It’s not a pre…
  • Flickr Photos

    "Swamp Monster" DOI Video"Swamp Monster" DOI Video"Swamp Monster" DOI Video
    More Photos
  • access to justice Activism arbitration Avandia bailout banking big oil big pharma BP campaign contributions Campaign Finance campaign finance reform Chamber of Commerce Citizens United Citizens United v. FEC Climate Change Congress Consumer Protection corporate power credit cards DISCLOSE Act Don't Get Rolled economics economy elections Energy energy & climate EPA Ethics fair trade FDA fec financial reform first amendment free trade global warming gop government reform gulf of mexico Halliburton Health health & safety health care health care delivery health care reform Jon Stewart Lobbying lobbying and government ethics lobbyists McCain-Feingold medical malpractice money in politics nafta obama offshore drilling oil oilspill oil spill Open Government petition pharma political ads political advertising political contributions politics Rally to Restore Sanity scotus single-payer stephen colbert Supreme Court Transparency Transportation U.S. Chamber of Commerce wall street wto
  • Archives

  • Meta

    • Register
    • Log in
    • Entries feed
    • Comments feed
    • WordPress.com
  • NetworkedBlogs
    Blog:
    Public Citizen - Citizen Vox
    Topics:
    progressive, reform, politics
     
    Follow my blog

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

WPThemes.


Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy
  • Follow Following
    • citizenvox.wordpress.com
    • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
    • citizenvox.wordpress.com
    • Customize
    • Follow Following
    • Sign up
    • Log in
    • Copy shortlink
    • Report this content
    • View post in Reader
    • Manage subscriptions
    • Collapse this bar
 

Loading Comments...
 

    %d bloggers like this: